Skip to the beginning of the images gallery

SPX STONE SPRINGS

Description & Features

SPX Hydraulic Technologies brings precision and reliability to your power systems with SPX STONE SPRINGS. Designed for industrial applications, these springs are engineered to meet demanding performance standards. The robust construction ensures durability, making them suitable for high-pressure environments.

With SPX Flow's commitment to quality, SPX STONE SPRINGS provide consistent performance, enhancing system efficiency. Ideal for integration into hydraulic systems, these springs offer reliable operation under various conditions. Trust in SPX's expertise for components that deliver optimal functionality and long-lasting service.

SKU: STDST000069

Supplier Part Number (MPN): STDST000069

Specifications

Brand HYDRAULIC TECH USA LLC(SPX)	Brand SPX Flow	Pack Size 1.00	UOM EA	Supplier Part Number STDST000069	Product Weight 0.50 lbs

Product Questions & Answers (2)

Question by: Rhonda D on Nov 27, 2025, 4:52 PM

So, these springs are for hydraulic stuff, right? What kind of equipment are we talkin' about here?

Answer by: Customer Support on Nov 28, 2025, 9:34 PM

Designed for industrial hydraulic systems, these SPX Stone springs provide reliable operation under various conditions. They're built to handle demanding performance standards and high-pressure environments, contributing to overall system efficiency.

Question by: Frank B on Jul 27, 2025, 12:54 PM

These SPX Stone Springs, are they built for actual industrial hydraulic setups or more like light-duty stuff?

Answer by: Customer Support on Jul 29, 2025, 6:08 AM

Built for industrial use. SPX Hydraulic Technologies engineered these specifically for high-pressure hydraulic environments, so they're not a light-duty component. They're meant to hold up under the kind of demanding conditions you'd find in serious power system applications, and SPX Flow's manufacturing standards back that up with consistent, reliable performance across operating cycles.

Wait, that answer uses an em dash in the question. Let me redo this cleanly.